Objective historical evidence

I promise not to turn into ciphergoth, but...

Someone on wildeabandon's LJ posted a link to the objective historical evidence for the bible.

I am absolutely stunned at the emptiness of the arguments found therein. Let's look at the article The Evidence for Christianity, since it's the featured article on the site. It's of intermediate difficulty, a quality that it shares with myself.

However, I'm more at an entry level when it comes to theology, so I'm going to summarise what I think yer man is saying, and then if you want you can tell me I'm wrong. The paragraphs are handily numbered for the purpose, although not in a very clear manner (I assume because Microsoft Word works in mysterious ways).

( BEWARE! THEOLOGY! )

Read along with the original for the best effect...